By: Ritzuko Gutierrez
Unfortunately, there are flaws in our system. One of these flaws is the lack of access to high-quality, affordable health care in rural areas. People who suffer from this issue, may be incentivized to rely on illegal activities. For example, illegal logging in order to get cash to pay health care needs. Tropical forests are mainly affected. The loss is greater than gain and it leads to a change in landscapes, livelihoods, biodiversity, and climate change. Providing high-quality health care to rural communities with limited resources and income options living nearly a tropical rainforest benefits both conservation and human health. Globally, 35% of protected areas are managed by local communities and when designing a conservation program, they are rarely considered in it. Although, this idea has benefits for humans and the environment, it also has its negative consequences. When applying, incentive-based conservation approaches, it can either go well or bad. Benefits are not always distributed equally, therefore these benefits would not reflect as good as one would like. It is important that when applying this idea, there should be a community leadership in the design. This means that the community should be part of the program and that it should focus on pressing health and well-being needs. Then, we can obtain a good health-care program and an improvement on the number of tropical rainforests trees.

You are completely right, as I have witnessed it myself that most often these important conversations are in small communities where there is no order in the sense of organization for the conservation of such land, moreover these small rural communities do not have the money and therefore time to yield the correct or beneficial stand when conserving such places like the forest.
ReplyDelete